Section 33: The Notwithstanding Clause
Constitutional text, simplified legal explanation, key principles and selected Supreme Court precedents.
Constitutional text
Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.
The wording above is a concise constitutional-text presentation for this page. Use the official Justice Laws source below for the complete current text and all subsections.
Simplified legal explanation
Section 33 allows Parliament or a provincial legislature to expressly declare that legislation will operate notwithstanding section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of the Charter. The declaration has a maximum constitutional life of five years, although it can be re-enacted. It does not apply to every Charter right.
Key constitutional points
The declaration must be express and must identify the relevant Charter provision or provisions.
The override can apply to section 2 and sections 7–15.
It does not apply to section 3 democratic rights, section 6 mobility rights, section 23 minority-language education rights or section 24 remedies.
A declaration expires after five years unless re-enacted.
The federal Parliament and provincial legislatures can use section 33 within their respective constitutional authority.
Selected Supreme Court precedents
Five-Year Limitation
Section 33(3) provides that a declaration ceases to have effect five years after it comes into force, or earlier if the declaration specifies an earlier date. Section 33(4) permits re-enactment, which starts another five-year period under the constitutional rule.
Quebec Sign-Law Litigation — Ford v. Quebec (1988)
Ford v. Quebec concerned Quebec legislation requiring French-only commercial signs and found an infringement of freedom of expression under section 2(b). Quebec subsequently used the notwithstanding clause to continue the disputed sign regime temporarily despite the Charter ruling. The case is therefore an important historical example of section 33 in operation.
How to verify the law
Constitutional summaries are useful for orientation, but the exact constitutional text and current Supreme Court jurisprudence should be consulted for a legal question. Selected cases on this page explain important principles but do not constitute a complete case digest.
Frequently Asked Questions
International Money Transfer & FX Rates
Sending funds for tuition, rent, or immigration fees? Retail banks sneak 2.5%–4% into exchange rates. Check today's real mid-market rate first.
Constitutional authority
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms forms Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Constitution is supreme law in Canada, and section 52(1) provides that an inconsistent law is of no force or effect to the extent of the inconsistency.
The Charter primarily governs Parliament, governments, legislatures and governmental action within the scope specified by section 32.
This section in context
| Provision | Section 33 |
|---|---|
| Subject | The Notwithstanding Clause |
| Source | Constitution Act, 1982 — Part I |
Educational use
This page is designed for general education and newcomer orientation. A constitutional question involving a real dispute should be assessed using the current legislation, procedural history and binding jurisprudence.